Class notes
Late Renaissance / Mannerism; Baroque: Caravaggio

PERIODIZATION:

High Renaissance (1500-1520):

Classic art, harmony, balance, calm repose/restraint, idealized beauty (nude),
full recuperation of classical and monumental forms

Late Renaissance/Mannerism (1520-1600)

Takes art not nature as its model and distorts Renaissance harmony to display
intellectual virtuosity—maniera / conceit (concetto)
--distortion of proportions, elongated forms, affected grace, studied instability

BAROQUE (Barocco) (1600-1750)

--negative term, falling away from classicism for the bizarre and exaggerated,
linked to Papal obscurantism

--art form of Counter-Reformation Church, overtly emotional and sensory
appeal to the faithful to impress splendor of the divine and the Church

--influences by the new Science, Copernican universe of movement and
infinite space, faith in sensory experience

Seven elements of the Baroque:

            --Classicism
            --Naturalism
            --Psychology (passions of the soul)
            --Space
            --Time
            --Light
            --Theatricality

Major Baroque Artists in Rome:          

Annibale CARACCI (1560-1609)
   --renunciation of Mannerism and recuperation of Renaissance classicism

Michelangelo Merisi da CARAVAGGIO (1573-1610)
 --pittore selvaggio (wild painter); gritty naturalism; lack of decorum;
   chiaroscuro (contrast of light & dark) and tenebrism (use of shadows)

Gianlorenzo BERNINI (1598-1680)            --The Michelangelo of Baroque Rome
--plasticity and movement to sculpture; theatricality, meraviglia (the marvelous),
  fusion of the arts in major Church commissions


BAROQUE ART IN ROME

MANNERISM: 1520s – 1600 (Style looks not to nature but to art, based on intellectual distortion of classic forms)

--Benvenuto Cellini, Perseus and Medusa, 1549-1554
                     
--Salt Cellar with Neptune and Earth, 1540-44.

--Parmigianino (Girolamo Francesco Mazzola), Madonna of the Long Neck, 1535 /               
              compared with Michelangelo’s Pietà (1497-1500)

BAROQUE: 1600-1750

--Annibale Carracci (1560-1609):  Loves of the Gods, Palazzo Farnese ceiling
         decoration (c1600) with detail panels of Jupiter & Juno, Anchises & Venus
       
Return to ancient and Renaissance classical idealism.

--Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio (1571-1610)
          --Basket of Fruit, 1596
          --Boy with Basket of Fruit, 1593
          --Boy bitten by a lizard, 1595
          --Calling of St. Matthew, 1601
          --Saint Matthew and the Angel, 1601
          --Entombment of Christ, 1602-04
          --Supper at Emmaus, 1606
          --The Incredulity of St. Thomas, ?
          --Crucifixion of St. Peter, 1601
          --Conversion of St. Paul, 1601
          --Madonna of the Pilgrims (Madonna of Loreto) (1604);
                contrasted with Raphael, Sistine Madonna (1513)
          --Madonna of the Serpent, 1606
          --Death of the Virgin, 1606
          --The Martyrdom of St. Matthew, 1601
          --Judith Beheading Holofernes, 1595-96
          --David with the Head of Goliath, 1606
                  (Goliath’s severed head is portrait of Caravaggio)

--Gian Lorenzo Bernini (1598-1680)
          --Damned Soul (c. 1619) (self-portrait)
          --Cardinal Scipione Borghese, 1632 (about to speak)
          --Goat Amaltea with baby Zeus and baby Faun, c. 1613
          --Putto Wrestling with Dragon, c. 1613
   Borghese Gallery statues:
          --Aneas, Anchises and Ascanius, 1618-19
          --Pluto and Proserpina,1621-22
          --Apollo and Daphne, 1622-23
          --David (1623-24), (self-portrait)
                contrasted with Michelangelo’s David (1501-1503)
   Coronaro Chapel in Santa Maria della Vittoria with the
          Ecstasy of Saint Theresa of Avila, 1647-1652

St. Peter’s Cathedral
--
Bramante chief architect, 1505-1514
--Michelangelo chief architect, 1546-1564
--Maderno’s façade, 1612
--Bernini’s Bronze Baldacchino, 1624-33,
--Bernini’s St. Peter’s Throne or Cathedra Petri, 1656-65
--Bernini’s Colonnade (1657-1678)

High Renaissance (1500-1520/27)

--Classical art, harmony, balance, organized by single-point perspective, idealized (nude) beauty,
full recuperation of classical and monumental forms; the representational problems of the early Renaissance have been solved

Late Renaissance/Mannerism (1520s-1600)

--Takes art, not nature as its model and distorts Renaissance harmony to display intellectual virtuosity, individual expressionism
and unconventionality—characterized by maniera (manner), concetto (conceit), allegoria (allegory)

--Proportions are distorted, forms elongated and twisted, the illusion of space is unrealistic, there is an affected grace and a studied instability

--16th-century artists took the formal vocabulary of the High Renaissance as their point of departure but used it in ways that were diametrically
opposed to the harmonious ideal it originally served.  Instead of nature as their teacher, Mannerist artists took art. While Renaissance artists
sought nature to find their style, the Mannerists looked first for a style and found a manner.  This art calls into question classical principles,
normative proportions and lucid space of the High Renaissance.  It puts into question the Renaissance idea of man at the center of the world in
secure, complete control of his destiny.  Figures tend to become distorted in the interest of expressionism, elongated in particular.  It is a highly
intellectualized art distinguished by its very self-conscious cultivation of artificial grace, eclectic borrowings, complex iconologies and abstract symbolism. 

--In Mannerist paintings, compositions can have no focal point, space can be ambiguous, figures can be characterized by an athletic bending
and twisting with distortions, exaggerations, an elastic elongation of the limbs, bizarre posturing on one hand, graceful posturing on the other hand,
and a rendering of the heads as uniformly small and oval. Mannerist artwork seeks instability and restlessness. There is also a fondness for allegories
that have lascivious undertones.  We see some examples of it in Parmigianino’s Madonna of the Long Neck and Benvenuto Cellini’s Salt Cellar for
Francis I and Perseus for Cosimo dei Medici.

Baroque Art in Rome—1600-1750

--Baroque/barocco—negative term, a falling away from classicism for the bizarre and exaggerated; but also a hightened naturalism

--Art form of Counter-Reformation Church, spirituality conveyed via an overtly emotional and sensory appeal to the faithful (passions of the soul;
emphasis on ecstatic visionary experience and martyrdoms) to impress splendor of the Catholic faith and Church; linked to papal obscurantism

--Influences of the New Science; a Copernican universe of movement, infinite and expanding space (broken cornice, trompe l’oeil) expressive effects
of light (chiaroscuro, use of natural light), dramatic theatricality (work of art as multi-sensorial staged representation)

Baroque Art has had a bad reputation passed on from 18th-century Neoclassicism as irregular, bizarre, or otherwise departing from established rules
and proportions.  The word perhaps derived from Portuguese barroco, used to describe an irregular or imperfectly shaped pearl.  It became the official
art of the Catholic Counter-Reformation Church which adopted a propagandistic stance in which art was to serve as a means of extending and stimulating
the public’s faith in the Church.  To this end the Church adopted a conscious artistic program whose art products would make an overtly emotional and
sensory appeal to the faithful.  The Baroque style that evolved from this program was paradoxically both sensuous and spiritual; while a naturalistic treatment
rendered the religious image more accessible to the average churchgoer, dramatic and illusory effects were used to stimulate his piety and devotion and
convey to him an impression of the splendor of the divine.  Baroque church ceilings thus dissolved into painted scenes that presented vivid views of the
infinite to the observer and directed him through his senses toward heavenly concerns. 

Some characteristics of Baroque Art:

1)      Naturalism.  Unlike the portrayal of reality in terms of a rationalist derivation of the most beautiful aspects of nature or as an neoplatonist ideal of
beauty as perceived in the mind’s eye of the artist (Michelangelo), Baroque artists took a more naturalistic approach to reality, depicting it in all of its varied
and individualized aspects.  Caravaggio’s paintings are the most extreme form of this trend with his use of  gritty models from the Roman streets and his motto
that the best painter is the one who knows how “to imitate natural things well.” 

2)      Interest in “Passions of the Soul—getting into psychology of soul.  Saintly visions and ecstasies, scenes of martyrdom.  Addresses the senses directly and
reaches the intellect through the emotions rather than through reason.  The emotional range is prodigiously expanded (v. Renaissance containment).

3)      Interest in Copernicanism and the New Science leads to the exploration movement in space and expansion of spatial boundaries.  Renaissance single-point
perspective implies an assumption of a fixed distance between observer and subject that creates a window onto space.  With naroque art the space between the
picture or sculpture and the viewer are broken as the image reaches out to us (the broken cornice and trompe l’oeil).  As a result of such efforts to achieve an
integration of real and fictional space, the observer becomes an active participant in the spatial-psychological field created by the work of art.  An interest in the
infinity of space.  Form is no longer closed and contained but opens up.

4)      Light and its expressive effects.  It is one of the principal expressive means of the baroque artist beginning with Caravaggio’s notion of “chiaroscuro.” 
In decoration of churches real light is frequently introduced to denote divine intervention (dove of the holy spirit in St. Peter’s).

5)      Theatricality: the art piece as a multi-sensorial staged representation. 

Architecture

Il Gesu’, 1568-1584 (Jesuit Style)

--Council of Trent made known its view on architecture, which, it said, should create a spiritual environment for worshipers.  To satisfy this requirement, there was a
surge in church construction during the Counter-Reformation.  One of the requirements: a return of hierarchy, an implied separation of the priest from the congregation
was to be reflected in architecture as well, the Renaissance central church plan being rejected in favor of  a modified Latin cross plan. 

--The most important of these churches, the Gesu’, was designed according to the dictates of the Counter-Reformation.  Begun in 1568 it was the mother church of the
Society of Jesus and would become the most influential church of Baroque Rome.  It is a modified Latin-cross plan with barrel vaults and individual side chapels.  The
chapels, a series of identical square modules, each with its own altar, allowed for the worship of individual saints and could be owned by private families.  Under this
arrangement, the congregation was directed architecturally toward the high altar in the apse, which was illuminated by light from the dome.  Since the only other source
of light in the Gesu’ was the clerestory of the nave, the crossing became the most illuminated space in the church.  The light at the crossing thus contributed to the dramatic
character of the high altar.  Wide nave and barrel vault was to provide space for a large congregation and to improve the acoustics.  This enabled worshipers to identify spiritually
with the text and music of the Mass, as desired by the council of Trent.  Through simultaneous stimulation of both the visual and auditory senses, the faithful might be transported
into a trancelike state that would bring the heavens before their eyes.  The splendor of the vision which increased by the lavish decorations and trompe l’oeil ceiling paintings.

Francesco Borromini (1599-1667) was he most unorthodox and revolutionary of the Baroque architects.   With San Carlo alle Quattro Fontane sets the
facade of the church into an architectural motion, making a counterpoint of concave and convex on two levels, while emphasizing the sculptural effect with deeply recessed niches. 
The wall undulates, creating a sense of organic pressure pushing in and out against the surface.  The lower section is a series of three curves: concave, convex, concave.  The upper
wall is composed of three concave sections framed by a second set of large columns.  Instead of the continuous cornice on the first level this one is broken by the large medallion held
aloft by angels.  Above the medallion, the balustrade crowning the wall rises to a peak, carrying one’s gaze skyward. This façade is no longer the traditional, flat frontispiece that defines
a building’s outer limits; it is a pulsating membrane inserted between interior and exterior space, designed not to separate but to provide a fluid transition between the two. 

Painting:

Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio (1573-1610)

--pittore selvaggio; a gritty (but devotional) naturalism, street models, accused of lack of decorum; 1st artist to disregard High Renaissance notion that the object of a work of art is to
be beautiful; “imitare bene le cose naturali;

--manipulation of light and dark through tenebrismo and chiaroscuro; disruption of the frame

--Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio (1573-1610): Has become famous as a painter maudit, indecorous, licentious, violent, slovenly behavior, prophet of realism, creator of an
aesthetic revolution. Giovanni Pietro Bellori, the most influential critic of the age felt that Caravaggio’s refusal to emulate the models of his distinguished predecessors threatened the
whole Classical tradition of Italian painting that had reached its climax in Raphael.  Yet many paid Caravaggio the genuine compliment of borrowing from his innovations and his influence
on later artists, as much outside Italy as within, was immense.  He opposes Academic classicism with its goal of realizing a perfect ideal of nature and insisted instead on absolute faith
to the individual model, depicting the truth of a particular experience.  His religious art has no heroes, no idealized Christ or saints, and sacred events are shown taking place in squalid
surroundings.  Perhaps the 1st artist to disregard the High Renaissance notion that the object of a work of art was to be beautiful.  Nevertheless, his art is devotional in that it is an
intensely serious treatment of the subject at hand.

Early works: studies of young boys and still lifes.  Boy with a basket of fruit (1593-94).  Sensuality of boy, accurate depiction of fruit and attention to detail, including
marks of age and decay on fruit.  Perhaps a young friend, perhaps a self portrait.  Boy bitten by a lizard (before 1595): interpreted as an allegory of the senses—from the wound of love
to that of pleasure that is quickly transformed into pain, to the fleetingness of youth and life.  Sensuous nature of boy (uncovered shoulder and flower in hair) and all of the sensual display
of being bitten by the lizard, still life detail of bowl and flowers.  Contrast of boy’s expression and beautiful still life—interesting recoiling movement of his body, away from classical repose. 

Sick Bacchus (1591, Augenti 222)—corruption of the beautiful, pale-greenish-blue skin tone of a boy in a state of sickness or perhaps as an allegory for the state of the soul, the so-called
“furor lunare” thanks to which artists of melancholic temperament were able to create their best works; perhaps of self-portrait of Caravaggio made with a mirror when he was suffering from malaria. 
Sickness shown also yellowed leaves and bare grey slab which is reminiscent of a tomb slab.

--Madonna di Loreto (1604-5): Compare with Raphael’s Sistine Madonna. Applauded by the public but criticized by the official critics.  Here the Madonna is brought down into
the street, notice feet of worshipers that are dirty.  In fact, the dirty feet seem to thrust right out above the heads of the viewers standing in the chapel.  By dwelling on grimy feet and threadbare
clothing, he likened his pilgrims to the paupers, or worse, beggars in Rome who were described by one observer in 1601 as “so numerous that it is impossible to go anywhere in the city without
being surrounded by them.” If objectionable on Roman Streets, beggars were downright unseemly in a holy altarpiece.”  Neither saints nor wealthy donors, these anonymous worshippers turn their
faces away from the viewer, their whole beings intent on the vision. The travertine moldings suggest a Roman façade and the crumbling stucco on the wall to the right perhaps evokes the poverty in
which Christ grew up.”

--Calling of St. Matthew (1601): Contarelli Chapel in San Luigi dei Francesi (The painting depicts the moment in which Matthew abandons his trade as a tax collector to follow
Christ.   It is a classic example of Caravaggio’s use chiaroscuro / tenebrism, his “dark manner.”  The sharp and sudden relief it gives to the forms and the details of form emphasizes their reality
in a way than an even or subtly modulated light never could.  Dark next to light is naturally dramatic.  The technique goes quite well with material that is realistic and is another mode of Baroque
illusionism by which the eye is almost forced to acknowledge the visual reality of what it sees.  In the hands of Caravaggio, tenebrism also contributes mightily to the essential meaning of his pictures. 
A piercing ray of light illuminating a world of darkness and bearing a spiritual message is a central feature of the Calling.  The setting is typical Caravaggio, a dingy tavern of the sort that the artist
frequented himself.  Into this mundane environment, cloaked in mysterious shadow and almost unseen, Christ, identifiable initially only by his indistinct halo, enters from the right, with only one
disciple, Peter. With a commanding gesture (picked up by the ray of light and other hands) he summons Matthew to a higher calling.  The astonished tax collector, whose face is highlighted for
the viewer by the beam of light emanating from an unspecific source above the head of Christ and outside the picture points to himself in disbelief:  “Can it be I that you call?” He seems to say. 

Crucifixion of St. Peter, 1601 (S. Maria del Popolo)--Diagonal composition.  Scene without any reference whatsoever to the sublime.  Three men, without faces and
with strong muscles, lift a cross, and the emphasis is on the physical strain of lifting the cross.  The face of Peter noble but course and tinged with fear.  The picture portrays the grim death of an
old man without any glorifying or uplifting mediation.